The E5c didn’t emerge in isolation. It was enabled by years of parallel work happening quietly across custom monitoring, live sound, and manufacturing — work that proved intimacy, reliability, and trust could coexist at the ear. This piece documents how those unseen efforts converged inside a single product that ultimately rewired how an entire industry thought about personal audio.
From the Archives of Can I Get a Little More Me
As this project has taken shape, something unexpected has happened: people who were there — often quietly, often early — have begun reaching out to add their memories to the record.
This entry draws from multiple conversations with Steve Johnson, who served at Shure from 1993 to 2003, including five years as Vice President of Global Marketing during a pivotal period when the company moved from stage-bound reliability to personal sonic intimacy. His reflections document not just how the E5c came to be, but how it quietly rewired how an entire industry thought about listening.
What follows is not a product launch story.
It is a record of a hinge moment.
When Shure’s Personal Stereo Monitor systems began gaining traction among touring professionals, the company faced a simple reality: they controlled the wireless signal, but not the part that actually lived in the artist’s ear.
The E1 proved the system worked — but it did not meet the standards set by the custom in-ear pioneers Dr. Stephen Santucci, Marty Garcia, and Jerry Harvey, whose UE5 Pro had already become the on-stage benchmark.
The E5 was built to close that gap. Not as a consumer play, but as a universal-fit monitor reliable enough to complete Shure’s system end-to-end. If artists later moved to customs, fine. If they didn’t, the E5 needed to stand on its own.
And it did.
But the E5 didn’t emerge in isolation. It was built on an ecosystem already in motion.
By the time Shure entered the in-ear category, a small but rapidly evolving network was already shaping the language of monitoring. Custom monitors were beginning to take hold on major tours. Westone was refining shell manufacturing. Knowles was supplying the balanced armatures everyone was experimenting with. And a handful of engineers on the road were learning — night after night — what musicians actually needed in their ears.
Shure brought the RF backbone and system reliability.
The ecosystem supplied tacit knowledge of fit, sound, and comfort.
Partnership discussions were explored — and inevitably fell apart — but the E5 ultimately emerged from this shared environment: the same driver technologies, the same shell techniques, the same acoustic principles, the same road-tested feedback loops. Different companies. Different missions. Unmistakably parallel DNA.
The E5’s success wasn’t accidental. It was the culmination of an era — proof that universal-fit in-ears could carry the same emotional weight and sonic integrity as customs.
Inside Shure, that realization changed everything.
The E5c was not a cost-down variant.
And it was not a marketing exercise.
It marked a philosophical pivot — the moment Shure stopped building an accessory for a wireless system and started building a listening device for human beings.
Internally, caution ruled. The early 2000s were tense: budgets were tight, the economy was soft, and no one wanted to fund an experiment in a market that technically didn’t exist yet.
As Johnson recalled:
“I told the Executive Committee: we’ll do this the least expensive way we can. I’m worried about liability, not marketing.”
What he meant was simple: Shure was about to place professional-grade sound directly into the ears of everyday listeners — and that required a higher standard of instruction, guidance, and care than anything the company had done before.
So instead of a traditional launch, Shure did something far more consequential.
They treated the E5c as an instrument of influence.
This was years before Beats.
Years before influencer culture.
Years before celebrity headphones became a strategy.
Shure quietly placed E5cs in the hands of musicians, students, young engineers, and early adopters — people who could feel the difference immediately, long before they had careers to speak of.
No endorsements.
No hype cycles.
No sponsorship banners.
Just clarity, durability, and fidelity — placed directly in front of the people who would later become monitor engineers, studio mixers, FOH legends, and producers.
It wasn’t advertising.
It was future-proofing.
As Johnson put it:
“I wasn’t trying to create another consumer company. I wanted to reach the people who weren’t pros yet — so when they became pros, they’d already trust Shure.”
Shure wasn’t trying to win a sale.
They were trying to win a career.
At the time, Shure had no internal industrial design team. Every aesthetic decision came through external partners — guided by a deceptively simple question Johnson returned to repeatedly:
How does this inspire confidence?
That question reframed everything.
Knobs, housings, cables, finishes — none were neutral anymore. They were emotional cues.
The E1 looked clinical, almost medical — a reminder of Shure’s lab-driven heritage. The E5 and E5c rewrote that vocabulary. Clear housings revealed purpose. Cable design signaled durability. Translucent materials celebrated engineering instead of hiding it.
The shift was subtle, but profound.
Shure didn’t design fashion objects.
They designed confidence — into plastic and wire.
As the E5c moved beyond the stage, new challenges emerged — airplanes, tour buses, hotel rooms, and improvised listening spaces revealed limitations in playback systems musicians had never encountered before.
Shure treated these not as inconveniences, but as part of the listening experience.
That’s why the E5c shipped with thoughtful accessories, including an inline attenuator that elevated signal quality in noisy environments. Once isolation removed ambient noise, the flaws in consumer playback systems became obvious. Shure’s response wasn’t to mask those flaws — but to help listeners rise above them.
The same principle applied everywhere: delight the user in every venue, not just the one the industry expects.
Internally, the E5c was a declaration.
As Johnson remembered:
“So why not go aspirational? Let’s price it where people say, ‘Wow, that’s a lot of money — maybe I should check it out.’”
The price itself became a signal.
Steve Jobs ordered a pair.
Jann Wenner did too.
On airplanes, people stared at the translucent shells and quietly wondered what they were.
Years before celebrity headphone culture, Shure had already proven personal audio could function as a luxury object — without losing credibility.
Even the language had to evolve.
“In-ear monitor” felt technical.
“Canal phone” felt clinical.
“Headphone” didn’t capture the intimacy.
The team landed on a bridge word: earphone.
It seems obvious now. At the time, it was category-defining — accessible to consumers, non-threatening to professionals, and expansive enough to describe something the market hadn’t yet named.
Language created the category.
Seen today, the E5c is not a relic.
It’s a hinge.
A brand rooted in reliability took a risk on emotion — and in doing so, redefined what listening could mean for an entire generation.
The E5c didn’t just sound good.
It made listeners feel considered. Included. Seen.
That is the through-line — from stagecraft to self-expression, from professional trust to cultural desire, from hardware to habit.
Intent scales.
Design travels.
And when a company protects its signal through market cycles and cultural reinvention, innovation doesn’t disappear.
It compounds.
Steve Johnson served at Shure from 1993 to 2003, including five years as Vice President of Global Marketing from 1998 to 2003 — a period that reshaped the company’s trajectory. During his tenure, Johnson helped guide Shure’s transition into personal monitoring and oversaw the development and strategic framing of the E1, E5, and E5c.
Known internally for his clarity of purpose and focus on user confidence, Johnson’s work in category language, packaging ritual, and early product-placement strategy helped establish the emotional and cultural architecture that continues to define Shure’s personal audio lineage.
His firsthand recollections form the foundation of this record.
2022
2022
2022
2022